Question on testing for BlaBlaCar - Test and Learn AMA
Guendalina In the intro to this AMA session, I saw that you've been testing different "From" names in different markets. We've done this as well in multiple markets across Europe and North America. I'm curious to learn which types of names worked better than others, how many variations you tested and how long the tests lasted for.The Personalized Variation Test in Campaign
We are doing our first A/B test out of Braze and the client wants to utilize the Personalized Variation test vs. the Winning Variation test. Now since we don't have many campaign history to go by since we just started deploying out of Braze, does that matter if we still run the Personalized Variation test? Does it go by past history characteristics OR solely similar characteristics on the initial test?
Conversion Rate over 100%?
Hi, I'm struggling to understand the performance of one of our Canvases. I have both the conversion event and exit criteria as "any purchase", and users cannot re-enter the canvas. When I analyze the variants, I see more conversions than entries, leading to a conversion rate over 100%, which shouldn't be possible. Does anybody know what could be going wrong here? thanks!
Forge Canvas Template: Product repurchase reminder (with timing and channel testing)
Hello fellow Braze orchestrators, I didn't make it to Forge in person this year, but it was great tuning in to the keynotes and catching up on all the latest Braze innovations. 🔥 Here is a quick Canvas that we are about to launch to drive repurchase of two of our products that customers need to by on a regular basis. Entry criteria: purchase of a certain SKU Experimentation (both set up as Personalized Path): Message timing (30 days vs 45 days after the purchase) Message channel (email vs SMS, in this case) Message sequence: A user gets a reminder to repurchase the product she might be running low on; If a user engages with the message from step 1, but does not purchase, he receives a reminder 3 days later with a special offer, to incentivize the purchase. Let me know if you see any opportunities for improvement. I imagine, soon we will be able to simplify this flow by leveraging all the upcoming Braze AI tools. Cheers, Olga Baker Charlie Banana / P&GLiquid arrays personalization
Hello everyone I'm trying to implement this liquid code in one of my templates: {% assign combinedResults = canvas_entry_properties.${data}.results | concat: canvas_entry_properties.${data}.featuredResults %} {% assign results = combinedResults | sort: 'totalEstimatedCost.amount' | reverse %} The arrays canvas_entry_properties.${data}.results and canvas_entry_properties.${data}.featuredResults are two arrays that contain a list of offers, with each offer having a name, an ID, and a totalEstimatedCost.amount Using this Liquid code, I want to first create a third array called combinedResults that merges the offers from both canvas_entry_properties.${data}.results and canvas_entry_properties.${data}.featuredResults. Then, I want to sort this combined array so that the offers are displayed in descending order based on totalEstimatedCost.amount, from the highest to the lowest price However, the issue is that the displayed list first shows the two offers from the featuredResults array sorted in ascending order (from the smallest to the largest price), followed by the five offers from the results array sorted in descending order (from the largest to the smallest price). Do any of you know why this could happen? the structure of the original arrays is the same. Thank you in advance!
